Re: [AD] dll binary compatibility maintenance.

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Again I don't see the benefit: WIP versions are not meant to be binary
> compatible so why to bother with a WIP-specific mechanism to handle that ?
> And for official versions there is the "no remove" rule.

so what you're saying is that as long as allegro is in WIP we can just
rebuild the symbol table from scratch everytime functions or variables are
removed... that's ok with me. if you would like to undo my changes then feel
free to.

-henrik




Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/