| Re: size_t (was Re: [AD] Unicode (3)) |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
> I wonder if we should start using `size_t' where it makes sense.
> In this case, we could use `size_t' for the size parameters, and use
> `int' for the `n' parameters. I think it helps readability, like
> `const' (even if "AL_CONST" is particularly ugly ;-)
It seems that ANSI C even uses 'size_t' for the 'n' parameter in the
strn*() functions, but in this case of course 'n' is a number of bytes too.
I agree to your proposition.
--
Eric Botcazou
ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx