Re: [AD] pack_fwrite and const

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: conductors@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AD] pack_fwrite and const
From: Laurence Withers <lwithers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 23:40:07 +0100

In reply to Vincent Penquerc'h <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>is there a reason why pack_fwrite's buffer pointer argument is not const
>or is it just an oversight ? i think it should, but i thought i'd ask
>before.

It is qualified as AL_CONST, at least in my copy; CVS says that
src/file.c hasn't been changed since Feb 21, and I just did an update.

Bye for now,
-- 
Laurence Withers, lwithers@xxxxxxxxxx
                http://www.lwithers.demon.co.uk/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [AD] pack_fwrite and const
  - From: Vincent Penquerc'h

References:
- [AD] pack_fwrite and const
  - From: Vincent Penquerc'h

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] [AL] Allegro 4.0 beta
Next by Date: Re: [AD] blit() bug in win2k using gfx_directx_win
Previous by thread: [AD] pack_fwrite and const
Next by thread: RE: [AD] pack_fwrite and const

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/