Re: [AD] fceil

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > They look like MSVC problems to me.
> 
> Wouldn't 'stricteness' be better than 'problem' ?

And the difference being...?  ;-)

> Initializing a 'void *' pointer with the address of a function is a little
> hazardous...

I don't think so.  Putting a non-address in there would be bad for
portability, but an address is an address is an address.

Anyway, how do we get rid of the warnings without resorting to ugly
typecasts?



Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/