Re: [AD] small bugfix for the fix class

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


In reply to Bitland@xxxxxxxxxx:
>The class could be enhanced *and* reduced in source size, if the 
>explicit specialization templates would work, but either I've done it 
>absolutely wrong (like in my first trial posted some weeks ago to AL-
>list), or there is something to do in DJGPP. At all I couldn't implement 
>all samples of a good reference book. So better we'll wait until this 
>will be standard, or (in case it was my fault) I would need someone to 
>help with --- if it's of interest at all, (I'm not sure that anyone uses 
>this class because the bug is older ;)) 

As far as I can see, explicit specialisation works fine in DJGPP (which
is, of course, just gcc ported to DOS); it is a confusing thing to get
working if you have not done it before, however.

If you would like some help, then mail me personally.

Bye for now,
-- 
Laurence Withers, lwithers@xxxxxxxxxx
                http://www.lwithers.demon.co.uk/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature



Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/