| Re: [AD] num lock dependent scancode conversion |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000 19:09:03 +0100 George Foot
<gfoot@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> I don't think we should mangle the codes used in the key array
> at all. Scancodes refer to specific keys, not the functions of
> those keys. We don't shuffle up the scancodes in order to
> support different keyboard layouts, and I don't think we should
> process numlock at that stage either.