Re: [AD] New patch for `const'-correctness

[Peter Wang <tjaden@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Laurence Withers <lwithers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Here is another patch for `const'-correctness, made against the latest
> CVS version as of today.

There are a couple of references to `const' which I think should be
`AL_CONST'.  Attached is another patch (against CVS) to be applied
which fixes some `const'-related warnings on Linux/X.  Tested by
compiling with first with AL_CONST defined then not.  Someone else
will probably have to do the same for DOS and Windows.

BTW, according to ahack, "(PTR*)" should be "(PTR *)".

-- 
tjaden@xxxxxxxxxx - http://www.psynet.net/tjaden/
You can't judge software by its default configuration.

Attachment: constfixup.diff.gz
Description: application/gunzip