Re: [Re: [AD] more updates...]

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


George Foot <gfoot@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm also committing the reverse of a bit of one of your earlier
patches, which I think was an accident -- your earlier patches
took the AL_CONST out of some function prototypes, which stopped
the library building for me.  I've put the AL_CONST back in, and
guess-modified the Windows source so that that will work with
the AL_CONST too.  I hope this hasn't broken it.

An accident or a misunderstanding. 
I just picked some of the files from the CVS tree and combined them with
the latest WIP. In order to get this to compile was it necessary to
comment out AL_CONST and I sent the files like this to Henrik. He must
have changed the prototypes to match the implementation instead of the
reverse.
I should have been clearer about this so the responsibility is mine.

You should be able to build without warnings and the result should be as
good ( or bad) as the MSVC build.

About the .def file does it seems like the current is listing the inline
helper functions. I do not think that this breaks anything but a cleaner
.def file should have some value.

Peter


____________________________________________________________________
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com.



Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/