| Re: [AD] Allegro CVS version |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On Mon, 14 Aug 2000, George Foot wrote:
> > > The date information could be made unique, but I don't know that
> > > there's a lot of point.
> >
> > Date could be used as a global CVS source tree revision number. But noone
> > has direct access to CVS server to modify it to do it that way.
>
> Maybe that's possible using those weird tags, which CVS can fill
> in with revision numbers and the like.
Aren't revison numbers file specific (different file versions in one
source tree)? But never mind, it's not important.
> > P.S.: To Tom G. (canvaslink maintainer - if I'm right): there was no
> > Reply-to header in George's mail - is it gone? I'll miss it...
>
> AFAIK the conductors list has never used a Reply-To header.
Really? Well, it's hot here, maybe my brain gone out ;-)
Have a nice day.
Stepan Roh