| Re: [AD] Allegro CVS version |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On Mon, 14 Aug 2000, George Foot wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 04:09:08PM +0200, Stepan Roh wrote:
> > I noticed that CVS version of Allegro still has WIP 3.9.32 label :
> >
> > from allegro.h :
> >
> > #define ALLEGRO_VERSION 3
> > #define ALLEGRO_SUB_VERSION 9
> > #define ALLEGRO_WIP_VERSION 32
> > #define ALLEGRO_VERSION_STR "3.9.32 (WIP)"
> > #define ALLEGRO_DATE_STR "2000"
> > #define ALLEGRO_DATE 20000313 /* yyyymmdd */
> >
> > This should be changed to avoid confusion. At least replace 'WIP' with
> > 'CVS'.
>
> That seems a good idea. I don't know what to do with the rest;
> we could make the version number be 3.9.33 (and then 3.9.34 as
> soon as 3.9.33 is released).
Yes - "3.9.32 (WIP)" is latest WIP available, now we have "3.9.33 (CVS)"
and next WIP will be marked "3.9.33 (WIP)" and in that time CVS will be
marked as "3.9.34 (CVS)".
> The date information could be made unique, but I don't know that
> there's a lot of point.
Date could be used as a global CVS source tree revision number. But noone
has direct access to CVS server to modify it to do it that way.
Have a nice day.
Stepan Roh
P.S.: To Tom G. (canvaslink maintainer - if I'm right): there was no
Reply-to header in George's mail - is it gone? I'll miss it...