RE: [AD] New patch for `const'-correctness

RE: [AD] New patch for `const'-correctness

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: <conductors@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [AD] New patch for `const'-correctness
From: "Isaac Cruz" <icruzbal@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2000 14:26:21 -0000

> Actually, I don't see why we don't just use `const', then #define it
> to nothing when it is unavailable.

I agree with you, I think there aren't compilers which don't support const

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [AD] New patch for `const'-correctness
  - From: Vincent Penquerc'h

References:
- [AD] New patch for `const'-correctness
  - From: Laurence Withers
- Re: [AD] New patch for `const'-correctness
  - From: Peter Wang
- Re: [AD] New patch for `const'-correctness
  - From: Laurence Withers
- Re: [AD] New patch for `const'-correctness
  - From: Peter Wang

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: [AD] TGA palette patch
Next by Date: RE: [AD] New patch for `const'-correctness
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] New patch for `const'-correctness
Next by thread: RE: [AD] New patch for `const'-correctness

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/