| Re: [translations] Current translation environment |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/translations Archives
]
- To: Federico Bruni <fede@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [translations] Current translation environment
- From: Walter Garcia-Fontes <walter.garcia@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 1 May 2021 09:50:16 +0200
- Cc: Jonas Hahnfeld <hahnjo@xxxxxxxxx>, Translations Lilypond <translations@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=upf.edu; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:organization; bh=FMj5JxGAr2Z68glG9DQHlc7icw+9ZiZY4Jve7z5KUHc=; b=dzqwJcgNaK103TAPwMnyVc1TvneQhTOHLRfdmTz4cJ50BiU5MuS4g79Z1XZAzeCMEb rceyfFaBYY88oXOODohJgx+4djStDTtc9aJ2pKnTgUuD9UF1EOsdoae/LMTiBcLQUASi OaI34I/r7ZYbNUXlbHTgbdLc1UF/pKr/0reKA=
- Organization: Departament of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra
* Federico Bruni, fede@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [30/04/21 23:48]:
> On Fri, Apr 30 2021 at 23:25:24 +0200, Jonas Hahnfeld
> <hahnjo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > No, merge requests to the 'translation' branch won't work
> > because no CI
> > jobs are configured. If you submit a MR, please directly target the
> > master branch - automatic testing will make sure that it doesn't break
> > the build before it can be merged. I encourage all translators to
> > switch to this workflow and effectively retire the translation branch.
>
> I think it's a good idea. Let's see what other translators think of
> it.
The patch generation was the workflow suggested in the Lilypond
documentation for translation contributions.
So should I ask for push permission? Or should my contributions still
be reviewed?
--
Walter Garcia-Fontes
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat