| Re: [translations] Git translation branch policy change: merge with and from stable/2.16 |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/translations Archives
]
- To: Francisco Vila <paconet.org@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [translations] Git translation branch policy change: merge with and from stable/2.16
- From: John Mandereau <john.mandereau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 12:05:30 +0200
- Cc: David Kastrup <dak@xxxxxxx>, Translations list at lilynet <translations@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :content-type:x-mailer:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=v7SVnu7w1d4yRUYb/FPXTrhOLFvIDdNOoYd+u9ptchY=; b=KYrnHkGq2axy21H2VqF1tPvfjWjJiGVrUy3wfp1YIhYWzbeD51p7vyry4MNuoxOCje YTBkV9kdcFDbo0jHItNxp81U/TnhkHFw4nQ5MAtI52Z5Wmr9FnqYG5b6SpDsGIJtL1K+ FanlZbPCEUvl5q9zCZrV6mSgYuqprIEb/N3roiMHPgJuap++4n++khmIxloLG0zifXRV xDpRqjGqJjk/0HFu9sGJIT7Lp2k3MWHJKnACNHHilgbeut50wwiYGpZVzJCLh96ooDb6 c0KB1VrbDHhkA+Lt9Jkw1D1n86ZMFc7A4MhzRA3QHdDbBHV9FvlKu2udYFFtJl+dQ/w+ 3ByA==
Il giorno lun, 01/10/2012 alle 10.01 +0200, Francisco Vila ha scritto:
> John, David: do you agree or disagree on anything of the above?
>
> Specifically, do you agree in that translations for 2.17 are stalled
> and can not progress because we are stuck in 2.16, and in that all
> translations in stable can be ported directly to 2.17?
The problem is, what holds next 2.16 release, which energies are needed
for it? The policy of syncing translation and stable/2.16 works as long
as there are relatively frequent stable releases, in particular I
thought by this time 2.16.1 would already be out. If 2.16.1 can't be
out very soon, it's probably best to merge stable/2.16 and translation a
last time, then merge stable/2.16 into staging, then sync translation
with staging/master again as usual.
Best,
John