| Re: [translations] Git translation branch policy change: merge with and from stable/2.16 |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/translations Archives
]
- To: Francisco Vila <paconet.org@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [translations] Git translation branch policy change: merge with and from stable/2.16
- From: Federico Bruni <fedelogy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:44:58 +0200
- Cc: translations@xxxxxxxxxxx, David Kastrup <dak@xxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=PP5wUhk6c8p81nLmftQxbvj7fUpz5MeZp6ku/nRl+68=; b=mHPjpEqbR7BbhK+I3e+Hz2wgDWY92uzN9l8H9yvjvtD0THtCTR+rD1CpcJQU6Oha80 NER2bLLQCf92EHRm5bgTeTZAtwE2zI/msTrr4NoN+A2YnCf/bke0qFlDJ5IcjPCAigWo 0tcZMDpW/FBvhUKa8XppCBu0Vtw8oyo5Q43dCv8U3tXRIO5thZGxkqjA5J5+902kpinA pJJSmrTXZnnNkyt/WBM4DhKLufESb35Wct/tIHNnACUakN9pv8M1yvamagCX3b8QEk/a /KxUxWT2FnRdFLH8JyFbo3TPRTjZcPQLjKcbcC4iw5I0WxfK3nDgMhz+60a3gEa4G+FK EzGg==
2012/9/25 Francisco Vila <paconet.org@xxxxxxxxx>:
> 2012/9/25 Federico Bruni <fedelogy@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> I'm asking because I've just committed a patch that should be backported:
>> 16bf0d2978f9b18b935e22a4c8e31e4b2c321797
>
> Should it be backported because it translates recent work from 2.17?
> Master has not been merged on translation since before 2.16.
>
Ok, I misused the term "backport". The patch translates from current
translation branch, so it will be included in 2.16.1 for sure.
I asked just to be sure...
I don't know if David will backport some documentation changes.
I think that issue 2791 should be backported to 2.16.1, but it's not
been marked with label:Backport
David, what do you think about it?