| [translations] Re: Warning for de, fr, ja (footnotes) |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/translations Archives
]
- To: Translations list at lilynet <translations@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [translations] Re: Warning for de, fr, ja (footnotes)
- From: Francisco Vila <paconet.org@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 14:31:10 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ST+gHTrjPUQh3Z3g60AfyRhsIvcKsQhvgQNYbFonuKM=; b=pNAQv3l3iNdSxFDVkyiDIgoDPZ9ElirZzx2sGHMa8JrzzDnazryQJn5yKZDBwWU+1V k0IA7EN2jdqmpyTtYr797CcXK6jtXZqqSceYFdqzYy/Hr/cUzszRnG+Rwydd1jqwu3uZ qJtSfXdad1T336W5OgG2YZ4nqPH/ub1B0hgjc=
2012/2/2 Francisco Vila <paconet.org@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Hello, Please look at 34c2ef9 and update notation/input.itely
> accordingly. Better yet, please update notation/input.itely
> completely. Footnote syntax has changed and we can not compile the
> docs that use old syntax.
Actually, the warning was urgent for de/ only. make doc failed on
\footnoteGrob which doesn't work anymore (so I think) and 'git grep
footnoteGrob' outputs results in those languages, but only de/ had
them in actual lilypond code. I have now updated lilypond code in de/
and am testing it.
fr/ and ja/ do compile but still have footnoteGrob's in text.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com