Re: [tablatures] harmonics and slides II |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/tablatures Archives
]
- To: Patrick Schmidt <p.l.schmidt@xxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [tablatures] harmonics and slides II
- From: Marc Hohl <marc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:04:29 +0100
- Cc: Carl Sorensen <c_sorensen@xxxxxxx>, tablatures@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1292839471; l=1639; s=domk; d=hohlart.de; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH; bh=eQfIEd7EaYzpxadCvC80RWSxhKY=; b=H0rLC8lNpuJ+/tLdPoKxF0RGWrH0MkQDFIMyTQBTiRN9uLtzEolEUgcqPWgXbpc4C2V 0AsivsVICFtmQO03qWHF21O5xW/TSxPlkDys3gfKvddQKZ+qhPHTj/kqwIjB9QHqrmK8m yp7FcJ4TTZpall1UfSmnhqwMT9+4sTYhWZI=
Am 19.12.2010 20:42, schrieb Patrick Schmidt:
[...]
But I am not sure how this will interact with lily-git.tcl.
Is it still possible to use git after having made a patch with lily-git?
Yes, but I hope Carl will join in this discussion, because he did a lot
of work for
the lily-git.tcl programm, so he probably can give you better advice.
BTW: I didn't manage to write a scheme function to automatically
adjust length and thickness of glissandi in Voice and TabVoice
contexts. Sorry for that.
Today I posted a bug report concerning \hideNotes in tablature. It
affects one of the attached snippets.
Thanks for any help to improve.
Your patch look very good - one small correction perhaps?
+@lilypond[verbatim,quote]
+ratioHarmonics = {
+ \ottava #1
+ \harmonicByRatio #1/2<g\3 b\2 e'\1>4
+ \harmonicByRatio #1/3<g\3 b\2 e'\1>4
+ \harmonicByRatio #1/4 { g8\3 b8\2 e'4\1 }
+}
I would add \harmonicByRatio #2/3<g\3 b\2 e'\1>4
as well just to make sure that frets beyond the 12th can be accessed
by this method.
I wanted to keep the snippet as small as possible. That's why I
created a reference for the selected snippets
(tablature-open-string-harmonics.ly). It contains all eight ratios.
It's supposed to be some sort of look-up table for LilyPond users...
Ok, I see your point. I made my proposal just to show users at first
glance that other fractions are possible
(without adding *all* possibilities, of course), but probably that's not
necessary here, so just forget about
my comment.
Regards,
Marc