Re: [tablatures] slides |
[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lilynet.net/tablatures Archives ]
Carl Sorensen schrieb:
Ah, ok, then I misunderstood your proposal. Yes, if we include the alists, thenOn 9/14/09 11:33 AM, "Marc Hohl" <marc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Carl Sorensen schrieb:On 9/14/09 2:36 AM, "Marc Hohl" <marc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Federico Bruni schrieb:Valentin Villenave wrote: tablature.ly is a file written by Marc Hohl to allow us to test the new tablature features. It won't exist in any future version of LilyPond, as that code will be included in different configuration files (ask Marc if you want to know more). So, I think it might be a good idea to add tablature.ly in the LSR. (you find it attached)Hm, I am not sure about this, but if we would include it, we should remove the "moderntab" part, because this demands changing internal files to work properly.I think you could just add the changed definition to your tablature.ly file. Scheme doesn't object to redefinition of a procedure.As far as I know, the alists for resolving the clef name in scm/parser-clef.scm are not defined globally, so I had to put the definition for add-new-clef in this file.No question it's the right way to do it for 2.13.4. But the whole thin (including the alists) could be copied to tablature.ly for immediate use with 2.12, couldn't it?
everything will work as expected (at least I hope so ;-). I'll try to ship a working tablature.ly within the next days... Marc
Carl
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ | http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/ |