Re: [frogs] chord_name_engraver - help with c++ ... |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/frogs Archives
]
On 09/07/11 00:29, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> On 7/8/11 5:21 PM, "Jan Warchoł" <lemniskata.bernoulliego@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> 2011/7/7 Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>>>
>>> Docs are not required by developers, so you've already gone beyond the
>>> minimum.
>>
>> Oops, looks that i've required too much. Sorry.
>
> It's not a problem; it's always a good idea if developers add documentation.
> It's just not required.
>
And if the developer doesn't document it, how are the documentation
people supposed to know what to do with it :-)
Cheers,
Wol
---
----
Join the Frogs!