| Re: [frogs] [PATCH] chord names language |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/frogs Archives
]
On 12/9/10 4:23 AM, "Reinhold Kainhofer" <reinhold@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 9. Dezember 2010, um 06:06:28 schrieb Carl Sorensen:
>> Actually, we have it hardcoded in multiple lists.
>>
>> We have note-name->german-markup, note-name->semi-german-markup, and
>> note-name->italian-markup as well.
>>
>> I sketch out an architecture below that might allow us to do
>>
>> pitch->markup
>>
>> in the current language, and have it work out just that way.
>
> Ahm, I don't think that will work. In particular, I don't think that using the
> *INPUT* language to format *OUTPUT* is a bad idea. E.g. I'm writing everything
> in German, because that's the note names I have grown up with. However, in my
> scores, I sometimes use Italian note names for tunings.
Of course, this is true. I completely agree with you.
>
> Rather, there should be an easy way to specify the output language, too.
Yes.
Carl
---
----
Join the Frogs!