Re: [frogs] Issue 736041: Lilypond issues success/failure termination message - OK to push?

[Ian Hulin <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Carl,

On 06/05/10 01:17, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> On 5/5/10 11:03 AM, "Ian Hulin"<ian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>
>    
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I put this patch up for review about a month back.� Patrick has given some
> > feedback and I have implemented his comments.� Could someone have a look and
> > if it's OK push, please?
> >      
> I didn't see any issues in the patch, except that I was not sure that the
> discussion on -devel had reached resolution:
>
>
>
> <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.devel/28150/focus=28164>
>
> Did we ever achieve resolution on this?
>
> I see votes for
>      Han-Wen: Not in this format; give a summary of the results
>      Mats: Yes
>      James Lowe: Yes, if you add the name of the output file
>      Mark Polesky: Yes
>      Ian: Yes
>      Graham: Yes
>      Bert: Not needed, because the GUI can show the error message from the
> error code.
>
> So the majority says go ahead, I think.  Han-Wen, are you OK with that?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Carl
>    

Since submitting my original patch, there's a tracker open to add a -q 
option to Lilypond to implement Unix-style 'quiet' processing of all 
informational progress messages during a Lilypond compilation run.

This and the request for a message with a summary of results of 
compiling all files during a compilation session are enhancement 
requests on top of this patch and beyond the scope of what I wanted to 
achieve here.

Cheers,
Ian Hulin

---
----
Join the Frogs!