Re: [frogs] My First Patch: issue #1063 |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/frogs Archives
]
- To: Rodolfo Zitellini <xhero.gm@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [frogs] My First Patch: issue #1063
- From: Carl Sorensen <c_sorensen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 05:17:30 -0600
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Cc: "frogs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <frogs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Thread-index: Acr4DMNwIOl+MijpRSqQOfc/536UDgAAUWyB
- Thread-topic: [frogs] My First Patch: issue #1063
On 5/20/10 5:08 AM, "Rodolfo Zitellini" <xhero.gm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Wow -- this is the first time I've ever heard "clement" used in a sentence.
>> In the U.S., all I hear is "inclement"; I've even heard discussions about
>> whether "clement" is a word or not. Thanks for the education!
>>
> Well I have to admit I am not 100% sure it is correct, but I looked it
> up in the dictionary before using it :)
I checked the dictionary after I read it, and you are absolutely correct.
>
>>
>> If MyGrob's default value for 'myProp is 1, and I do
>>
>> \override MyGrob #'myProp = #10
>> \override MyGrob #'myProp = #2
>> \revert MyGrob #'myProp
>>
>> the value of 'myProp for MyGrob should be 1, not 10.
>>
>
> This works with my patch too. I have noticed, using the debugger, that
> every \override generates a call to execute_revert_property() before
> calling execute_override_property() on the same property - so you end
> up with only two copies (new and old) in the list all the times (this
> seems to be done for "normal" and nested properties).
Great! I'll test the patch as soon as I can.
Thanks,
Carl
---
----
Join the Frogs!