Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi all,
I've been lurking a bit on this thread, but felt I should comment.
I personally think we need a more general structure than \repeat will ever be able to reasonably offer. Essentially, we need to be able to say that a single movement/piece [of Lilypond code] consists of one or more \section blocks, where a \section would have at least the following independent options:
1. indent value[s] and/or line lengths;
2. section title (e.g. "Trio").
Then, each section can or cannot include standard Lilypond \repeat structures, as necessary.
BTW: I'm *not* saying that Lilypond's \repeat structure shouldn't be improved -- I'm just suggesting that we might be looking at two different problems here.
Cheers,
Kieren.
---
----
Join the Frogs!