| Re: [frogs] Patch for Issue #830 |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/frogs Archives
]
- To: Graham Percival <graham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Trevor Daniels <t.daniels@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [frogs] Patch for Issue #830
- From: Mark Polesky <markpolesky@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:42:36 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: James Lowe <James.Lowe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Marc Hohl <marc@xxxxxxxxxx>, Neil Puttock <n.puttock@xxxxxxxxx>, Carl Sorensen <c_sorensen@xxxxxxx>, Lily-Devel List <lilypond-devel@xxxxxxx>, frogs@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1261359756; bh=pS44PIm8Ji1LqQnPfK6PmWDFHP9vnvMj9S9ZyVxl0XQ=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=jmUgoowFrcsJXTH59/VbeB06BQalVbhjo7f2IEaZYcwZSiDk9mA7CYbzkNksvTmv/f1aCV+HH4c/OO7sXvhE2XkXWYRk7uR6rDIxqku8H0bGXc+thRKlBkR89uGCbcLe+1JTBXVzHht98MLJW9oMc7b5jojS1VQwwzyAAsqe8ng=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=fadoquyeZze1AYDXJ7RZBFu7QkbaVOuSRgr98bfh3SaTDi0lKiUo0+c6L1549b0UsdGns6xQipLK7ereclrwvFjmQ+PFSvvdzS90FfS5WunuyRz2F14bZRluyrzHSX8p24iZ/vNrr7cPFTkljuCjdJxmiG3xqcjzhen97bUSi1k=;
Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Actually, I don't think rebase is mentioned in the CG. I
> can't see it on a quick trawl. It should be, as a branch
> should be rebased before a patch is generated from it if
> master has been updated since the branch was created, else
> inadvertent reverts might be included.
>
> I'll have a closer look tomorrow to see what should be
> done.
Trevor, you should know that I might be restructuring the CG
quite a bit in the coming days...
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-12/msg00487.html
- Mark
p.s. why are all these replies coming in twice?
---
----
Join the Frogs!