Re: [frogs] Enhancement request: Define output-suffix as a configurable context property.

[Carl Sorensen <c_sorensen@xxxxxxx>]

On 9/20/09 9:04 AM, "Ian Hulin" <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>  
>>>  
>>> Remaining things to do would be
>>> * add define-parser-variable-properties.scm to build (whimper...)
>>>     
>>>  
>>  
>> 
>> No (whimper...) needed here; this is trivial to do.  Just add an entry to
>> scm/lily.scm.
>> 
>>  
>>   
> Wouldn't I need to add a dependency to the build, too? 

No.  The dependency for the build is determined by its presence in the scm/
directory.  That part of the build system is really quite fine and easy to
use.

>>  
>>>  
>>> * get the property access routines to use the new all-pv-properties list
>>>     
>>>  
>>  
>> 
>> I'm not sure I have this vision.  How would \set know whether to set a
>> context property or a pv property?
>> 
>>   
> Presumably the same way it decides whether to access a context property, music
> property, or grob property currently. 
> That's something I'll have to dig into.  I was sort of assuming the \set code
> did a lookup of available property lists, I'll undertake further research..

Please do.  If this works, I think it would be a great addition.  But we
still haven't heard what Neil thinks about it, and he has a much more
complete grasp of LilyPond internals than I do.

Thanks,

Carl



---

----
Join the Frogs!