Re: [frogs] Enhancement request: Define output-suffix as a configurable context property.

[Carl Sorensen <c_sorensen@xxxxxxx>]

On 9/20/09 9:41 AM, "Valentin Villenave" <v.villenave@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Carl Sorensen <c_sorensen@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> This seems like a good idea to me.  However, I'm not really strong on parser
>> variables.  But if this does work, I think it would be an improved way of
>> handling point-and-click, because, as you say, it would tie into the
>> existing LilyPond syntax.
> 
> I could update the tracker page accordingly... Can you guys help me? :-)

I think that we shouldn't yet add a tracker for the general solution.  We're
still working on the output-suffix issues, which might have a more general
solution.

Thanks,

Carl


---

----
Join the Frogs!