Re: [frogs] patch for issue 708 |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/frogs Archives
]
- To: frogs@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [frogs] patch for issue 708
- From: Neil Puttock <n.puttock@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 22:55:28 +0100
- Cc: lilypond-devel <lilypond-devel@xxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=gh9vDA82SDl/Wh5Kv+2hlF6QfY8v2IJqyNV0vHbWlzY=; b=kBTNtzh3rNJIHHnXNGJTeHFYMWSwIeCFRtB0tPqCc8NuK5iSeCKI03JE4ULov1jYKq Kq8FXtIGn7pYvbc8ED0CI0AvdPP1FVbm/4LkTSWyba1CECBl7pREc5e6ISJ2t2dsomhW 4oNwgRwlO8PZr4pqCfERNglM9paOJ7rpUYPsk=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=GEVhLBH982RXa1RNaEqwpu/xyZVIzmiFuMaOKhLi14ldr1xtJo3RIZ9YfV75BBylUD TAKL9w7ytqJ2NiugzwR3NHiTcZJGOtakcQlAY47Xb/vIEdHUaCbxHLf4lVfTZmMKChLh qq8mnECbNvYAlO4X8z55XSUwNj8099bmmuX+A=
2009/5/24 Carl D. Sorensen <c_sorensen@xxxxxxx>:
> On a more general note, do you have any suggestions for how to check
> convert-ly rules? For code, we have regression tests. For convert-ly, as
> far as I know, we have nothing. Should we be establishing convert-ly
> regression tests?
I'm not sure how that would work. Convert rules are unlikely to break
unless there are drastic changes between Python versions, so I think
the best option is to keep each rule as specific as possible and test
it thoroughly before it's committed.
Regards,
Neil
---
----
Join the Frogs!