| Re: [frogs] my contribution: barCheckNumber to endSpanners |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/frogs Archives
]
- To: frogs@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [frogs] my contribution: barCheckNumber to endSpanners
- From: Graham Percival <graham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 22:19:15 +0800
- Cc: lily-devel <lilypond-devel@xxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=nYnU9ZccwjNs3J/j7mOs3PyVLmJV3vqb58D7LsyHcRI=; b=kpCxOLH9I54EPzFeP2M31/zhtXMWqN9q8jJqvRpRYaixxtNkoIhOaER07742myad0r glm31mBNh7OJzF137c6R5yZlvBfgS0Xh1D6yFR1Xpy4fI2k7nw+ngWXSSYRGyMuHt3Mr ePkRHLnO8/93Jz1R2WL4eCsnTLvGD5sIBy5l0=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=KJG+kn7HgiVWSiamdY6Lod55mPwQIxdizOzLRLBZkXGV8unoU2FF/j6H6ytdW1W6nx 1su3FttIwRS1qB30tqjJSnPJIBleMPcqSHce6rJmDqq4i3pOCzQVASTQsj2PlXj1JwlJ nUvKYhxh0t3B0CEPu+yoyRJvo8pye7ZHgmh1E=
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 06:05:42AM -0700, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>
> I've only used @code{} because I saw it in the docs before I started.
>
> I think @var{} makes more sense.
>
> Anybody on -devel have a definitive answer to this question?
I have no personal opinion on the matter, but
Documentation/user/writing-texinfo.txt -- or rather, CG 3.2.4 --
has a few thoughts. :)
Cheers,
- Graham
---
----
Join the Frogs!