| Re: [frogs] Suggestions to Contributers guide |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/frogs Archives
]
- To: "frogs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <frogs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [frogs] Suggestions to Contributers guide
- From: "Carl D. Sorensen" <c_sorensen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:50:39 -0700
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Thread-index: Acl377Dm0DQrcO73QIyd8qRTA1WQjgAG6InV
- Thread-topic: [frogs] Suggestions to Contributers guide
On 1/16/09 8:30 AM, "Graham Percival" <graham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 04:03:09PM +0100, Hajo Dezelski wrote:
>
>> 2. The first results of the frogs like code normalisation (positioning
>> of doc-strings), Definitions of Variables, etc. should find entrance in
>> the guide.
>
> Yes, definitely -- I intend to prompt Carl to add this material,
> bt he of course has many other tasks.
>
I'm not sure what to add. I guess I can add a bit somewhere about using
docstrings to document scheme functions, including the guidelines for good
docstrings, but that's about all I see going in the CG as far as specifics
of the first Frog task are concerned.
Do either of you (Graham or Hajo) see more than this?
Thanks,
Carl
---
----
Join the Frogs!