| Re: [chrony-users] [PATCH] socket: enable nanosecond resolution receive timestamp on FreeBSD |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More chrony.tuxfamily.org/chrony-users Archives
]
- To: chrony-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [chrony-users] [PATCH] socket: enable nanosecond resolution receive timestamp on FreeBSD
- From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 15:09:55 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1691586599; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qb1JoBEIKozefxl82kzrpwhLtleMahKnhUuVgc8B7+c=; b=X05foOoMuDz4k5DsFlmF/g545nHH2I5l75J3EffvPikHwAlKP14lq+lrmGs0PaDXntcQwi RbwIViYLRcKf34j7J4OxQuUMlGA+DsghpbecRHkqJlN81olJjJYQNBQCPAzfDlV05S9RH4 DRjAazizViIoA8PzlMfli7Zoc1oaFD0=
On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 08:20:18AM -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> This is just a quick patch to get better resolution receive timestamps from
> the kernel. As far as I can tell, the timestamps are supposed to be using
> the unix epoch. If not, I can switch it up from SO_TS_REALTIME to
> SO_TS_MONOTONIC which does marginally less work but its epoch isn't January
> 1, 1970 - it's essentially the uptime.
>
> Let me know if I missed anything.
Looks good to me. Just a minor coding style issue with the comment.
I'll fix that. Next time, please send patches to -dev.
I'd like to release final 4.4 today.
Thanks,
--
Miroslav Lichvar
--
To unsubscribe email chrony-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with "unsubscribe" in the subject.
For help email chrony-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with "help" in the subject.
Trouble? Email listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.