| 答复: [chrony-users] about 144-exp1 |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More chrony.tuxfamily.org/chrony-users Archives
]
Hello:
When analyzing failed cases, I find that make check executes cases 10 times slower than quickcheck. This seems to be related to rand_seed in run.sh. What is the connection?
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: chengyechun
发送时间: 2022年8月15日 16:44
收件人: 'chrony-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' <chrony-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
主题: 答复: [chrony-users] about 144-exp1
Thank you for your reply, I will pay attention in the future; Indeed, more than once in 50 attempts, I will try to modify make quickcheck and then observe the number of build failures.
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Miroslav Lichvar [mailto:mlichvar@xxxxxxxxxx]
发送时间: 2022年8月15日 16:24
收件人: chrony-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
主题: Re: [chrony-users] about 144-exp1
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 07:59:26AM +0000, chengyechun wrote:
> Hello all:
> When constructing chrony-4.2, I find that the new test case 144-exp1
> frequently fails. As a result, the build fails.
How often does it fail? More than once in 50 attempts? The tests are expected to fail occasionally. It's a compromise between sensitivity and the time it takes.
From the log I see you are building a package based on the Fedora chrony.spec, but the seed setting in %check is changed. Without a known good seed, you should use the "make check" command instead of "make quickcheck". That allows some failures.
Please don't send mails with such large attachments here. Either trim it down to the important information, or compress it.
--
Miroslav Lichvar
--
To unsubscribe email chrony-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with "unsubscribe" in the subject.
For help email chrony-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with "help" in the subject.
Trouble? Email listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.