| Re: [chrony-users] PPS Synchronization Verification |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More chrony.tuxfamily.org/chrony-users Archives
]
- To: chrony-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [chrony-users] PPS Synchronization Verification
- From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 13:35:49 +0100
- Authentication-results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=mlichvar@xxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1604321499; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dAPKzM693E90uVM2csU2EFd4eAdyVzPx3IJuWlRE96c=; b=AjP4CyxU0YoepZxE6dJCezEukgdLPiYlmmFGDgGSr9Q5SI3K0/2iC+VrvJ4GXe4levYuZ5 tQHzVgQJ+taY2/QBb8gKp8hYM4Imm+YcHcKwaslQaWcFR7meMq6dWCWE/g8fxalovhPtv8 UGPSFmUUZB3SI2QWvih1xp3sBxZH0ng=
On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 12:24:32PM +0000, Chang, Benjamin wrote:
> The PPS signal is coming from the NTP server (it's a syncserver S650) and is connected via a 232 line. I essentially did this https://www.crc.id.au/2016/09/24/adding-a-pps-source-to-ntpd/ but switched the ntpd kernel with the chrony kernel. Should I set an offset of .00002 for the PPS?
Yes, that should make two sources agree with each other. Or, you can
add the opposite correction to the NTP source. Without a trusted time
source it's difficult to tell which one is more accurate. If you
enabled hardware timestamping, I'd probably trust more the NTP source.
--
Miroslav Lichvar
--
To unsubscribe email chrony-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with "unsubscribe" in the subject.
For help email chrony-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with "help" in the subject.
Trouble? Email listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.