Re: [chrony-users] Ver 3.2 support of no RTC battery

[Vincent Blut <vincent.debian@xxxxxxx>]

[ Resending. This time cc’ing Robert! ]

Hi Robert,

> On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 03:11:18PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> > Back some time ago, I was dealing with an old version of chronyd in 
> > Centos (my notes say 2.1.1) and working with armv7 boards lacking 
> > RTC battery.  The hack was to add:
> >
> > rtcdevice /dev/doesnotexist
> >
> > There was somewhere a message (that I cannot find) that indicated 
> > this would be better supported in 3.2 (which is what I have in my 
> > current Centos image).
> >
> > If so, how do I tell chrony, no battery?

IIRC since chrony 3.1, you don’t have to set the rtcdevice directive to 
a non-existent character device file.

> > Another part of this was to add to /etc/sysconfig/chronyd
> >
> > OPTIONS=" -s"
> >
> > to take the timestamp from the driftfile.  Is this still needed?

Yup. The “-s” option is all you need now to deal with systems with no 
RTC or without any battery.

> > thanks

Cheers,
Vincent

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature