| Re: [chrony-users] Hardware timestamping in CentOS 7.4 (was: Possible to get sub-millisecond accuracy?) |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More chrony.tuxfamily.org/chrony-users Archives
]
- To: chrony-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [chrony-users] Hardware timestamping in CentOS 7.4 (was: Possible to get sub-millisecond accuracy?)
- From: Chris Perl <cperl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:49:39 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=janestreet.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=LA0jXhRd2/gyZhTyFIeXLk47BtG/CGvz6vletZZUT/M=; b=rqkhK+mhjGtlj6Uf0Zhr7v/O6jH8uHbTkCbAI7ww4Fc6zzdDymbwmEfPCikpPTP0A0 O0QxeFzdb/VMQ/rz+qv3H7lw2eqD63l46mjXwpJltQwj6d6ZkdqEW0ZmjQswIn8AgjOD ZPmkAqXsv035IWmWoAFTjOeSrGiohBf8HMW6M=
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It's the patch included in the package from the copr repo. Does it not
> work for you?
Oh, sorry that wasn't clear to me and I haven't had a chance to test
with it yet.
Is there something included in the copr repo that isn't in the git
repo? I'm not that familiar with copr, but based on what I have read,
I wouldn't think so.
If not, I'd prefer to just build from git. Assuming the relevant
changes are in the git repo, what are the relevant revisions?
--
To unsubscribe email chrony-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with "unsubscribe" in the subject.
For help email chrony-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with "help" in the subject.
Trouble? Email listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.