| Re: [chrony-users] Possible to get sub-millisecond accuracy? |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More chrony.tuxfamily.org/chrony-users Archives
]
- To: chrony-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [chrony-users] Possible to get sub-millisecond accuracy?
- From: Chris Perl <cperl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 08:58:40 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=janestreet.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=KKWhFCN2wsKO4uQQwuGtz3ZuB+VsqsfWwxY9aHhoo/g=; b=ANO51JM95ndxdAS2BOMhGuI4BSzGrUITk8y0x8tvYcHU8pJNKuiPMBfIvp/JU2xbzM 4gwa5mvVtNdMLRK8a+OlhTJFBq6BnifNQK0MtkgtzrjaifbPIiDTtKm8h1ZRDbKuYIw9 v4ng+DqepNPuN5m6ViMy9WJgfppQHFsRhb0f0=
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I doubt they will be added in 6, but 7.4 should have the OPT_CMSG
> option. Some minor changes in the chrony code will still be necessary
> in order to enable HW timestamping.
Yea, I wasn't expecting 6 to ever support it.
> Here is a copr repo for Fedora and CentOS 7 which has a patch to
> enable HW timestamping.
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mlichvar/chrony/
>
> It works even with <7.4 kernels if there is only one interface which
> supports HW timestamping as SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_CMSG is not required
> in such case.
Oh, exciting, thanks!
Does that mean exactly one up interface that supports HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL?
Meaning, would I be ok if the other interfaces on the machine
supported things like HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V1_L4_SYNC,
HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V1_L4_DELAY_REQ, etc, but did not support
HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL?
--
To unsubscribe email chrony-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with "unsubscribe" in the subject.
For help email chrony-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with "help" in the subject.
Trouble? Email listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.