Re: [chrony-users] Fwd: Chrony malfunctioning at beaglebones |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More chrony.tuxfamily.org/chrony-users Archives
]
- To: chrony-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [chrony-users] Fwd: Chrony malfunctioning at beaglebones
- From: Nuno Gonçalves <nunojpg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 21:02:53 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=FpGD87RCnH39nKnMl0WOK+AbAeRHhHHQr1tdOzIOpyM=; b=TpBhF/TG2TzCxYMhiB0/BHE68RjOK0NzWBCeTSy7LPunD8SyxZH9bnWoqW8XKWLB7Y Jv7Rt3nMuFy6MnXwCL/HChykCkabonMAv4K4lc5elpfkUwKBi9muP7uLjsX/5fc6pHN+ HMKY0HeicSqwvPnw8e3uCambdaJtZPZiyZ2EVDlzuEWPCmNOZ3m6TeaxljqkfrvovImY 2j9WtjnSTPoW3Z0/7FRkDtwLEz6fCqUfoHr+JexHV8zs6J7aeP5ObbKYfJ7hFGn1UiqY ckQHb47ZhL3+kr6drBhBIWvIkVNCCbF6d18nXC99ZDBGorTY6biI/KEUXwXDn7jjNqUg cmyg==
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It looks like the output was captured soon after chronyd was started.
> With only 4 measurements spread over 9 seconds such large frequency
> error wouldn't be unusual. What do you see when chronyd is running for
> an hour?
>
> To further debug this it might be useful to configure chronyd to not
> touch the clock by adding the noselect option to all servers specified
> in the config file and enable the measurements and statistics logs
> (see the logdir and log directives).
>
> It could be a bug in the clock source that is used on the BB. You
> could try a different clock source if there is more than one
> available.
I checked and I have a single clock source:
debian@bbw1:~$ cat
/sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/available_clocksource
timer1
Note that I tried to start chrony in a clean state, without a chrony.drift file:
debian@bbw1:~$ sudo systemctl stop chrony
debian@bbw1:~$ sudo rm /var/lib/chrony/*
debian@bbw1:~$ sudo reboot
After over 30 minutes the machine that have is not adjusting the clock
(servers with noselect), don't have any unreasonable estimate, but the
one adjusting the clock still have very large errors:
debian@bbw1:~$ uptime
00:39:28 up 37 min, 1 user, load average: 0.11, 0.04, 0.03
debian@bbw1:~$ chronyc sourcestats
210 Number of sources = 3
Name/IP Address NP NR Span Frequency Freq Skew Offset Std Dev
==============================================================================
ns.rnl.tecnico.ulisboa.pt 4 3 715 -71491.055 17976.291 -16.6s 199ms
adsl-62-48-148-210.ptprim 4 3 715 -71394.406 14362.602 -16.4s 230ms
a88-157-128-22.cpe.netcab 4 3 956 -72689.414 28005.160 -17.2s 382ms
debian@bbw1:~$ chronyc sources
210 Number of sources = 3
MS Name/IP address Stratum Poll Reach LastRx Last sample
===============================================================================
^* ns.rnl.tecnico.ulisboa.pt 3 8 377 233 +220ms[ -16.6s] +/- 11ms
^- adsl-62-48-148-210.ptprim 3 8 377 233 +218ms[ +218ms] +/- 83ms
^- a88-157-128-22.cpe.netcab 3 8 375 227 -169ms[ -169ms] +/- 69ms
debian@bbw1:~$ chronyc tracking
Reference ID : 193.136.164.1 (ns.rnl.tecnico.ulisboa.pt)
Stratum : 4
Ref time (UTC) : Mon Aug 17 19:53:42 2015
System time : 493154176.000000000 seconds slow of NTP time
Last offset : -16.801349640 seconds
RMS offset : 13.358787537 seconds
Frequency : 0.000 ppm fast
Residual freq : -71491.055 ppm
Skew : 1000000.000 ppm
Root delay : 0.021884 seconds
Root dispersion : 270.499451 seconds
Update interval : 238.8 seconds
Leap status : Normal
Note this machine have the clock so long in the past because the
default debian config does not enable steps, and the power on date is
Jan 1 2000. This doesn't make any difference.
Would you like remote access to the machine? I have a clean install of
debian, so you can hack it at will. If so please send me your public
key.
Thanks,
Nuno
--
To unsubscribe email chrony-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with "unsubscribe" in the subject.
For help email chrony-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with "help" in the subject.
Trouble? Email listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.