AW: [chrony-users] chronyd: Can' Synchronize WHY ? |
[ Thread Index | Date Index | More chrony.tuxfamily.org/chrony-users Archives ]
Hi Bill, > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Listengine [mailto:listengine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von > Bill Unruh > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. September 2011 06:11 > An: chrony-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Betreff: Re: [chrony-users] chronyd: Can' Synchronize WHY ? > > On Thu, 8 Sep 2011, thomas.schmid@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I get a lot of the following chronyd messages in syslog: > > What version of chrony This is the current HEAD, 1.2.6 + all changes up to September 1. > > Sep 8 00:50:52 Com-PC chronyd[3240]: Selected source <WAN-IP1> > > Sep 8 00:52:01 Com-PC chronyd[3240]: Can't synchronise: no majority > > Sep 8 01:02:18 Com-PC chronyd[3240]: Selected source <WAN-IP1> > > Sep 8 01:02:59 Com-PC chronyd[3240]: Can't synchronise: no majority > > Sep 8 01:03:27 Com-PC chronyd[3240]: Selected source <WAN-IP1> > > Sep 8 01:04:09 Com-PC chronyd[3240]: Can't synchronise: no majority > > Sep 8 01:04:35 Com-PC chronyd[3240]: Selected source <WAN-IP1> > > Sep 8 01:05:18 Com-PC chronyd[3240]: Can't synchronise: no majority > > ... > > > > The relevant section from chrony.conf: > > ... > > ; remote-WAN > > server <WAN-IP1> iburst prefer presend 5 > > ; remote-WAN > > server <WAN-IP2> presend 5 > > ; local-LAN > > server su-server1 maxpoll 7 > > ; local-LAN > > server lu-server maxpoll 7 > > > > chronyc> sources > > 210 Number of sources = 4 > > MS Name/IP address Stratum Poll LastRx Last sample > > > ======================================================================= > ===== > > ^x <WAN-IP1> 1 6 49 +13us[ -877us] > +/- 1148us > > ^x <WAN-IP2> 2 6 46 +192ms[ +192ms] > +/- 56ms > > Yee gads, that's pretty horrible, except for wanIP1 > IP2 seems really really far away. Why is it taking so long? <WAN-IP1> is connected by a 7 Mbps WAN connection, 2 LAN and 1 WAN-hop away.. <WAN-IP2>: The intermediate NTP server (WinXP+Meinberg ntpd) sits in the same LAN; however the WinXP is a virtual machine running on VMware Server 1.0.10.. Note: I know it's a big NO NO to run NTP servers out of (VMware) virtual machines, But 1) currently I have no other option 2) it makes for a good worst case testing. > > > > ^x SU-Server1.<domain> 0 7 10y +0ns[ +0ns] +/- > 0ns > > ^x LU-Server.<domain> 0 7 10y +0ns[ +0ns] +/- > 0ns > > Well something is certainly screwed up there. This says that the last > measurement was 10 years ago. Also while this says it is 0 ns jitter, > below it > says it is 4000ms jitter. > Something is seriously messed up here Sorry to mislead you: Due to my somewhat unusual system, I have to set up NTP sources which may not be available; and these 2 are such a case: Their IP address is not reachable. > > > > chronyc> sourcestats > > 210 Number of sources = 4 > > Name/IP Address NP NR Span Frequency Freq Skew Offset > Std Dev > > > ======================================================================= > ======= > > <WAN-IP1> 5 3 275 -2495.179 7713.381 - > 50ms 2452us > > <WAN-IP2> 4 3 193 568.775 561.325 > +202ms 1119us > > SU-Server1.<domain>. 0 0 0 0.000 2000.000 +0ns > 4000ms > > LU-Server.<domain> 0 0 0 0.000 2000.000 +0ns > 4000ms > > This is a complete mess. ip1 has a frequency 2000PPM out, with a > horrendous > skew. Actually <WAN-IP1> should be a really good source, but I have attached the statistics of PZF1 and PZF2 (as seen in the web interface), maybe it tells you something else. <WAN-IP1> = Meinberg_M300_PZF1_stats_20110830-20110908.PNG <WAN-IP2> = Meinberg_M300_PZF2_stats_20110830-20110908.PNG > How are you connecting to the SU/LU servers? > Why do they have 0 ns offset? They also have no entries (NR NP) I can > see why > chrony is completely confused and has no idea what the right time is. Same as above, sorry for confusing you: SU and LU are not reachable in this particular setup. > > Both reachable time sources are DCF77 (Meinberg M300 PZF, Host "PZF1" > and "PZF2"): > > - <WAN-IP1> is the Meinberg PZF1 itself (-> Stratum 1) > > - <WAN-IP2> is the Meinberg PZF2 run via WinXP+Meinberg NTPd package, > simulating an > > intermediate time server (-> Stratum 2) > > Where are they? PZF1 = <WAN-IP1> is behind a LAN/WAN/LAN-connection, with the WAN connection having 7 Mbps, going through 3 routers PZF2 = <WAN-IP2> intermediate NTP server is in the same LAN as chrony, but inside a [WinXP+ntpd] virtual machine running on VMware server 1.0.10; this again is connected by LAN and routers through a firewall to PZF2. > > Would somebody please explain to me in "laymen's terms" why chrony > cannot come to a selection ? > > Note: ntpd shows the same behaviour by switching it sys_peer also > quite frequently. > > You only have two servers, the WAN servers, and they disagree on what > the > right time is. Chrony has no idea which one to believe, since there are > only > two of them (whichis why you should have an odd number.) Hm, even if I have 3 valid NTP servers (setup with a valid <WAN-IP1>, <WAN-IP2> and "SU-Server3") I see the "can't synchronize" message a lot. > > Thanks, > > Thomas Schmid > > > > -- > William G. Unruh | Canadian Institute for| Tel: +1(604)822-3273 > Physics&Astronomy | Advanced Research | Fax: +1(604)822-5324 > UBC, Vancouver,BC | Program in Cosmology | unruh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Canada V6T 1Z1 | and Gravity | > www.theory.physics.ubc.ca/ > > --- > To unsubscribe email chrony-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > with "unsubscribe" in the subject. > For help email chrony-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > with "help" in the subject. > Trouble? Email listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
Attachment:
Meinberg_M300_PZF1_stats_20110830-20110908.PNG
Description: Meinberg_M300_PZF1_stats_20110830-20110908.PNG
Attachment:
Meinberg_M300_PZF2_stats_20110830-20110908.PNG
Description: Meinberg_M300_PZF2_stats_20110830-20110908.PNG
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ | http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/ |