| Re: [chrony-dev] Changing License to GPL for candm.h |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More chrony.tuxfamily.org/chrony-dev Archives
]
- To: chrony-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [chrony-dev] Changing License to GPL for candm.h
- From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 09:19:16 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1683616759; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XFzWY1bf0XPNjBjIV6C1/HKhQJMshwHHVRDtWedHFDg=; b=XQ+V2GR3+uqoUdbh46V3Tt0DGpYGr4WzcE/dK8AvSyNWxkV5KxYvdLajOCUZESobX6/REv vODZ17qnfTBn9l8ISrie+KwGoHD38HmUDN2NnlKPERwsOUXMBqdtzQOoGzaZnZIr7JogMf vj+etVlyQk/4erUBtKHlt8tjJoPt71k=
On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 05:10:17PM +0200, Walfred Tedeschi wrote:
> From our last conversations, it did not look like you had priority on that.
> We could bring more users/customers that would be interested in that tool.
> If so, would that increase the priority?
It might help to know there is a larger number of users interested in
it.
>
> At first, would you also be maintaining that code? In a positive case, it
> might be we would have some good contributions to add, taking good feedback
> from customer(s).
I'm willing to maintain the code. I'll try to publish what I have in
the next few weeks and see if that looks reasonable to you.
>
> But also interesting is the license planed for the library, what are you
> considering as a good license for the library?
I was thinking about LGPLv2+.
--
Miroslav Lichvar
--
To unsubscribe email chrony-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe" in the subject.
For help email chrony-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with "help" in the subject.
Trouble? Email listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.