| Re: [chrony-dev] SW/HW timestamping on Linux |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More chrony.tuxfamily.org/chrony-dev Archives
]
- To: chrony-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [chrony-dev] SW/HW timestamping on Linux
- From: Denny Page <dennypage@xxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 16:31:38 -0800
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=me.com; s=4d515a; t=1481157101; bh=i0t4wStUsEZXXdUmxqKtr/rAwGnH4uNbakz1hrzy3Cs=; h=From:Content-type:MIME-version:Subject:Date:To:Message-id; b=T8hvnO+13+LZ8hG4G4we5JrciERWPHtJ5XGFdMWTq9XNZ1NNIF10ayX5kkWCUcneP imhVDg917Zzc5mImhs1lGxRY3TG31hZqy3BIEO6aISyUmZAj5iX0wnFve6T16JT6ti 4B85jBGbyE3V4O032CCWDbVWU0pXdMuLqdZETUIoBWF46edQ6F4zjXSVQ6kB7ffbRu sYN4WpIA24AhkBaZ73gmj80F1BgU6Nbeb0MtwgEERpEokPEdm/7ybaAAhX5Fr4d+1W V9D3vJzfAx360Q0Rv12Y29yaxRuAdOU1q92rzAl0tvWJrJbPhQ9LGlOm6U7N5QCCzc NSPcPSWhrC8kQ==
> On Dec 07, 2016, at 09:20, Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Yes, I think that might be helpful. I spent some time today comparing
> your method with the current code and at least on my system with i210
> I see a shift in the distribution of the offset to one side when the
> network is (heavily) loaded. Compare these two histograms
>
> http://i.imgur.com/GsRwhyX.png (min delay * 1.1)
> http://i.imgur.com/MHYRCCx.png (min delay + sys_prec)
Can you say a bit about how these graphs were done? I would like to compare to the systems I have.
Have you tested any NICs other than the I210?
Thanks,
Denny
--
To unsubscribe email chrony-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe" in the subject.
For help email chrony-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with "help" in the subject.
Trouble? Email listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.