Re: [chrony-dev] SW/HW timestamping on Linux

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More chrony.tuxfamily.org/chrony-dev Archives ]

I tested with a usleep(100) following the sendmsg() call. This didn’t appear to have any impact. Was the usleep() intended to influence the order of timestamp vs. server response messages?

Denny


On Nov 14, 2016, at 11:04, Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

usleep() should be called after sendmsg(), e.g. in
NIO_SendPacket().


Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/