| Re: [chrony-dev] SW/HW timestamping on Linux |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More chrony.tuxfamily.org/chrony-dev Archives
]
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 08:59:17PM -0800, Denny Page wrote:
> I tested with a usleep(100) following the sendmsg() call. This didn’t appear to have any impact. Was the usleep() intended to influence the order of timestamp vs. server response messages?
Yes, that was the idea. Could you try increasing the sleep interval to
1000 or maybe 10000? Anyway, I asked about this on the Intel
development list:
http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/intel-wired-lan/Week-of-Mon-20161114/007226.html
--
Miroslav Lichvar
--
To unsubscribe email chrony-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe" in the subject.
For help email chrony-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with "help" in the subject.
Trouble? Email listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.