| Re: Is Slitaz Real freedom software |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives
]
- To: slitaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Is Slitaz Real freedom software
- From: Brenton Edgar Scott <trixarian@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 16:32:55 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lFDaFfOWDlUC9OlX3ae7Mtr4QQEdgTSNbod4sYiQgP8=; b=A5VFpEZZYSOXPXeSpU32cpbbAIfJ9zVgW8eIjBiVG9oXF6OLidPcK3smPK1U9A10ba tqi2Y8CSsfJZgX4M9FlQUw3avWiViqapvgqdYiWC0fUJTl/yFkJ5MwQXjfREQp/W4xr/ jbxms9SclxYpMf4e/A/ZvvJP8lix7Y7okAXri5P4yRxHFLtjMDxT3d92nBSs8V4UOMSv bUULcXLxXr5nVhnviCM+mICfT4o+6kIbSL02neLBTNTWNz87WbYqsKnXfabBHa0SERVS VnqelTpuU4GI0xnZj/S7RDtbKYwB3zDeZF9EsHBNxCsGc5CBhXIXTc4FaWrezkew7Xla nehA==
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:58:33 -0300
Claudinei Pereira <contato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We had the effort to have a "libre" version of SliTaz, to meet the FSF
> standarts. For some reasons, the guys that was working on int just
> dropped down.
>
> 2012/6/29 anibal beron <tsiolkovsi@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > I have de dude, and I whan to now why isn't slitaz in the FSF
> > completely free software distributions of GNU/Linux?
> >
> > thanks.
>
He dropped it because he didn't agree with SliTaz having sponsorships
and a small block for sponsors on the main website. Another thing to
note is that SliTaz can run WITHOUT the GNU tools. In fact GNU tried to
kill the BusyBox project because it removes the need for the bigger GNU
tools with Linux. So Technically SliTaz can be JUST a Linux and NOT a
GNU/Linux.
--
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/