Re: Slitaz vs DSL

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives ]


Tiny Core would be fine if I could figure out how to make a persistent file system so that when I download and install a browser it doesn't go away when I take Tiny Core down.  Its useless to me to have to sit an hour or more while I have to do all the downloads over each day.  I am just not very skilled with this stuff.

--- On Wed, 5/9/12, Mariusz Wojcik <mdickie007@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Mariusz Wojcik <mdickie007@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Slitaz vs DSL
> To: slitaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Wednesday, May 9, 2012, 12:57 PM
> Am 2012-05-09 04:08, schrieb Terry
> Maiden:
> > Was going thru a bunch of old CDs I made some time
> ago.  Found several that had Damn Small Linux on
> them.  The last "3" version and the last "4"
> version.  I was shocked how quick and easy they were to
> load and run.  Much faster than the latest versions of
> Puppy and faster than Slitaz (sorry).  Both had good
> versions of Firefox and both came up 1024x768 without my
> having to do anything to get that.
> > 
> I can't hear Damn Small Linux anymore. DSL is dead due
> infighting the project originators and developers. Good Idea
> for you is to go over to Tiny Core Linux and leave me in
> peace with Damn Small Linux.
> Thanks,
> Mariusz Wojcik
> 
> -- SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
> 
>

--
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/


Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/