[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives
]
- To: slitaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: TCC
- From: Mariusz Wojcik <mdickie007@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 18:13:28 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DPb9c+XwPzYO3O6OE63TzCiy62A7WeG1IMpkgaDiuS0=; b=h5fONkD+EEes/7S3L/7xJ3Jnq1bsp0iT7cUp3fdL9S/I0fLI3Y1VvRY0WAuqbQ+Sd1 p7Ib8jLyBHzAP5Q6ybg4rvafMcKuyG8CjIRlUqjqRzLd4Zk+GgKGR4z41AAuYFrQbSuW JZqVRD7Z4hzdEEQ1njhGv3vWrkGejaRuhnyhMVSvGKL4uUDtoEazu064o5645coJfACR pq3yQaGUAADo3kxQ2s4caW2pJlp+e9u88HDAW2Bwj2DDgi34Wv9+MYL4+mJDZEADeiYw N0hHHOdUPXrc40VcyR3e1f3+loC9gij3ycBmIPy1LTIrXBfsKwo1IXyN5/jS1i/3wXl/ eQOA==
On 2012-05-17 17:03, wrote Alexander Medvedev:
use -s and sstrip on gcc binary.
Yes, it works on gcc and tcc :-) .
Okay, we have got on gcc 5,516 bytes and on tcc 2,596 bytes (the same
size as before).
also, tcc is not well-maintained, it does not build lots of software
and that is build correctly is hella slow.
False, there isn't any Release appeared for a long time but this year
there are some commits on their git repository. I think it is because
they don't have any Release Planner.
//But Bellard is GENIUS!
Yes, he is :-) .
--
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/