[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives
]
@GoKhlaYeh, maybe you should speak with Christopher before you start
working - he has a new branch with kernel 3.x and a lot of bugfixes to
avoid dubble work.
Am Wed, 7 Dec 2011 21:13:13 +0100
schrieb Eric Joseph-Alexandre <erjo@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Le Mon, 5 Dec 2011 22:41:38 +0100,
> GoKhlaYeh <gokhlayeh@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> - Can you give us more detail about what you need to change in tazwok
> and receipts ?
>
> - For me the goal is to prepare release.
> Publish cooking, so more users can test and help us to fix.
>
> > As nobody does, I'm going to answer to my questions myself; in case
> > it interest somebody.
> >
> > > - Is tazwok still compatible with the wok ?
> > Not anymore. Incompatibilities are light and easy to solve. But it
> > involves changes to packages in the toolchain. Changes are only to
> > get back compatibility: it doesn't imply changes in the package
> > itself or how it's cooked by cookutils. It should not create any
> > problem if I push those fixes. Package will be recook but the
> > result will be exactly the same than the previous one. Anyone
> > against this ?
> >
> > > - What's the prefered way to compile full distro ?
> > To be honnest I feel like there's currently no way to recook full
> > SliTaz easily. Part of the reason is that I don't get how to use
> > cooker for that, and wok is not fully compatible with tazwok - which
> > itself need some work anyway. I don't think cookutils allows to
> > rebuild SliTaz for users, and I don't think it's coded for that
> > specific use.
> >
> > > - What kind of update should be done ? The wok was freezed to
> > > prepare the release, but release seems delayed until ???
> > I can't answer to that. And nobody seems able to. I think I'm going
> > to update receipts for tazwok compatibility, and eventually for
> > security/bug fixes. Nothing more until some choice are made at this
> > level. If nobody is against this, of course.
> >
> > > - What are your tought about our current goal? Prepare release,
> > > new update cycle, rolling release or what ?
> > I think that SliTaz need a stable release; but it doesn't seems to
> > be planned at all. It's like the distro doesn't exists without it's
> > leader.
> >
>
> ---
> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
>
---
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/