| Re: (cooking) - dropbear-pam 0.52, vs dropbear-pam 0.52? |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives
]
- To: slitaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: (cooking) - dropbear-pam 0.52, vs dropbear-pam 0.52?
- From: "Jeffrey 'jf' Lim" <jfs.world@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:07:22 +0800
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=KGOeE98jJZqLDMlf6YNKymQlSJzyTfkDqwbqHpFWe/U=; b=JfanoCoC14zLUMUpdXZIJn/LNkpqCA1XqnP1hPKfiFoo6gp+/WsSlL+vbWlzPTMfl9 /3MZ4K3Cgrz1fIqmsatJSe3jsuvCZtgF5J1vQQrH+wojjDz28uYUD9ki4n3Sjs9tpw1A D66BRXZbxEGfUrfs31EBqJjyQyTB/XsxM4qn4=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=xclrUDoR2moblIhI9oVLVITaH7grFe0TPK38RQH6b52r7vbpxs8wlCkcKi9xVL7JC1 wHSrhz+Rp80NXkyGKoD0L9hbYL9bD4/OESFdVLG0RMuPayepV1sLoRn2laMGu0A3TphI 0K0sU6BwusbSufXHW4JtRqyjd+F+q9OsaISbA=
anybody? (see below)
-jf
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim <jfs.world@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim <jfs.world@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> hey guys, I'm just wondering (i'm new to slitaz, btw. Just checking it
>> out) what the difference is between the 2 "dropbear-pam"s that I see
>> in the package manager when I do a search (for 'dropbear'). Is one for
>> stable, and one for cooking? Then what happens if i install the one
>> for stable while i'm running cooking? Whatever the case (even if it
>> makes no difference for now), it would really be good to be able to
>> highlight this difference in "version" by having a separate column in
>> the gui to show this?
>>
>> Another related question - what is the difference between 'dropbear',
>> and 'dropbear-pam'? From the names, it seems like 'dropbear' is not
>> using the standard username/password database ("pam") to handle login.
>> But if that's the case, how do i get to this database, and manage it?
>
>
>
>> At the very least (even if i dont know, or have no way of managing
>> this database right now), logging in with tux/root should work. But it
>> doesnt right now. I've looked at the official dropbear (whatever there
>> is inside the tarball) documentation as well - no mention of this
>> "no-pam" mode.
>>
>
> ok, nvm about this last bit. Turns out tux's password was not
> enabled... I can still login with the standard 'dropbear' (instead of
> 'dropbear-pam'). And of course, root login is not allowed based on how
> dropbear is called. The rest of the questions still stand, though.
>
> -jf
>
---
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/