(cooking) - dropbear-pam 0.52, vs dropbear-pam 0.52? |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives
]
- To: slitaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: (cooking) - dropbear-pam 0.52, vs dropbear-pam 0.52?
- From: "Jeffrey 'jf' Lim" <jfs.world@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:09:07 +0800
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=3WMme43AgNzKY4RUjOEogKrNnmoD6YnLg5V6LOlol9Q=; b=SuHTE36EVXlIvy6fKqz2nVwDRx4vJCK1mttVr7AAmWEubAZdI1h4lX4H/5x2JOgwv9 96OMGfPUQtwY2uqd/v1FbG3dEz9rrzWMnsrEoUpaE9DfGvtM4SYbeC+0IUCVd0Na9nR5 HujmsZmAiB3GrfpeimCBz1NVJtU/RRfuSu1JM=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=UtmWUgQZ7oIHfLQZCs3WCHK1To02MsF4MufFjx3N5Z5bOU6SdwtT0SsAKvGBPYax3r uo46hWEdjyPVPcqguyX9O2CgMBSUYVOU1uPB2YNGOVub5SyfPk5+MVUjJxxwANgXEUcl aaGpQirxCn+pB9yf7I9OnCQbtCpWalcm4hK94=
hey guys, I'm just wondering (i'm new to slitaz, btw. Just checking it
out) what the difference is between the 2 "dropbear-pam"s that I see
in the package manager when I do a search (for 'dropbear'). Is one for
stable, and one for cooking? Then what happens if i install the one
for stable while i'm running cooking? Whatever the case (even if it
makes no difference for now), it would really be good to be able to
highlight this difference in "version" by having a separate column in
the gui to show this?
Another related question - what is the difference between 'dropbear',
and 'dropbear-pam'? From the names, it seems like 'dropbear' is not
using the standard username/password database ("pam") to handle login.
But if that's the case, how do i get to this database, and manage it?
At the very least (even if i dont know, or have no way of managing
this database right now), logging in with tux/root should work. But it
doesnt right now. I've looked at the official dropbear (whatever there
is inside the tarball) documentation as well - no mention of this
"no-pam" mode.
-jf
--
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."
--Richard Stallman
"It's so hard to write a graphics driver that open-sourcing it would not help."
-- Andrew Fear, Software Product Manager, NVIDIA Corporation
http://kerneltrap.org/node/7228
---
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/