Re: [revevolutionair] BESTIOLLES

To: revevolutionair@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [revevolutionair] BESTIOLLES
From: Samuel laï <samuellai76@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:38:24 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=fdo3MB1mqRnikgecg5WyNO3pWy3DNiZEHKrg0ENrXQ4=; b=p8xrLvwMVCU3CQgScmsVNHFkytlSP6ixGbEtKVxkAfPKwsV08px2OB+OuSU/eGuXol vkUBKyeu+4xYJAq+n6EGPKchQSJenETkD6Tlq8cSS3xXyANDUlusENizmQ77PwWEh30Q pWZq/NWjig7ODQB60P0B0TULPF9CbjnxWEeCw=

Oui le coté 'exploitation' colle bien.

Neo

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [revevolutionair] BESTIOLLES
  - From: pierre constant

References:
- [revevolutionair] BESTIOLLES
  - From: pierre constant
- Re: [revevolutionair] BESTIOLLES
  - From: jonathan Keller
- RE: [revevolutionair] BESTIOLLES
  - From: pierre constant
- Re: [revevolutionair] BESTIOLLES
  - From: Samuel laï

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+