Re: [proaudio] gsampler: needs packaging

[Zlobin Nikita <nick87720z@xxxxxxxxx>]

В письме от 30 декабря 2013 19:14:25 пользователь Dominique Michel написал:

> > > So next question. gsampler is almost 2 years old, and the last

> > > commit into its repo is from July 2012. We already have jsampler

> > > which work and have orchestras support. The only issue with it are

> > > 1) it's in java and its GUI is slow, 2) it pollute like hell my log

> > > file if I don't redirect its output to /dev/null.

> >

> > Does its oldness make sence? The only thing, preventing me from using

> > it, unlike q/jsampler is that when you load GM sf2 bank, only few of

> >

> > >100 instruments are visible. I guess it possible if it uses only MSB

> > >without LSB for bank discovery and

> >

> > selection. But also, for sf2 only jsampler gives correct instruments

> > list (in qsampler it items are some nameless default, still can't

> > manage to report this issue).

>

> OK, so it is worth to have it. I will see what I can do, the main issue

> is to remove that /usr/doc directory.

>

I looked better. It seems, that doc installation stuff is overriden - it doesn't consider configuration option docdir, which is both default and specified by ebuild in configuration options.