| Re: [proaudio] removing of gnusound |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives
]
- To: proaudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [proaudio] removing of gnusound
- From: Karl Lindén <spray.sucks@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 15:44:26 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=T/aq2d48GxFIqAZGMHGzFIPHn0kCws+aHtnhx3GGiqo=; b=q+Y+0TzkAaYkrPO6IdO4uvyNtmt7r+Wl2kztS79F9XiHFPhsiYfAgdwtlZdAevZxs8 EHvOAzuG0EF/u16lxmcPhpRJLfpaRgD2G4eTWOYFW0NYyAIEI3DoxyaoACHx4YFcWSbE aJ0Cub7Y0pamDRxkOLuLMmp6X7WaqFzolQ3pwtXV4TiMbSm5PBBrHuVYUchQtsrQDaM4 NQ8OeZj/efmvAbjOvDFre+6UMitQWh6Ly3vReBGWbnPexPus/DXUrVaTJmNw9WojVWNL B3aJilbh/Y1CoYDlNKDiIULinqLfDH07/K0IwtmuvZySFkMbD/Ukt2Chdugjq+shFseQ gr6w==
I think it is OK to drop such software if the development has stopped
upstream and it does not compile. If upstream starts moving again and
can supply a less hard maintained package we can always re-add it.
Karl
2013/3/30 Dominique Michel <dominique.michel@xxxxxxxxx>:
> gnusound look like an abandoneware.tm.
>
> It doesn't compile, and even debian is tired of providing patches for
> it, and support it only in stable, which is very old.
>
> If any body want it, I will remove it into a few days.
>
> Dominique
>
> --
> "We have the heroes we deserve."
>
>