| Re: [proaudio] lv2core and lv2 blocks |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives
]
- To: proaudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [proaudio] lv2core and lv2 blocks
- From: keenblade <keenblade@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 16:48:03 +0300
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=r5CcN91Y8T65tl5kWqk84uLNPTVGq/flSlEt5DYP0u0=; b=JqIANWbuiGkQZRGQ4/zOtiVFXT9Y5jTWuRQHqi7iZhRN0/xFoq4Nm2bXzN9AW0UD0S cY4vNwqF9QYpX9hybOLI7p/B3lhSmDHngx5F6s1KejLy+I2ILOLmNWHEuChnW7I7WO0e B+TDKVpuVBAvh5i/uzfXb3MRPzySGq6TQXYZn3iH4yYGRGlXhERKbcrISHZhxeoQZliQ l4cXWuJT7ALHgIOs49+d1kXj/LwisAMLFr4CS/F86xh4kZ5pYqw6p+MS+fwAuPSt9U3h d1QC17C/p7zBLCHsdDoejmmCfpbjU14cMET9qoYXiamxmUKsNXtQelJzKUNViE9lWre1 XYUg==
On Pzt 14 May 2012 16:04:05 EEST, Arve Barsnes wrote:
> On 14 May 2012 14:17, Allan Klinbail <sonofzev@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I've been playing around installing lv2 for suilv and a couple of other
>> things for ardour3 builds.. It appears that breaks alot of lv2 plugins
>> which require lv2core... while lv2 and suilv are requirements for some
>> newer lv2 stuff in ardour
>>
>> Does anyone know if these are alternate implementations of lv2 or is one
>> of them going to take over.. (can't really find much via google)...
>
> They are the same program, with a new name, as far as I can tell. I
> simply changed my ebuilds to use lv2 and that seemed to work just
> fine. I *think* I reported it on this list, but since no updated
> ebuilds have appeared, results may not be the same for everyone.
>
>
>
AFAIK, lv2core is just the bare core that is needed. lv2 is a lot more
than that. What do you think about a virtual package for lv2 to solve
the problem? Donn't know the situation lately. If you know one of them
is about to be depreciated, I'll edit the ebuilds to reflect them.